A balanced view of balanced solutions
Critical Care, ISSN: 1364-8535, Vol: 14, Issue: 5, Page: 325
2010
- 148Citations
- 235Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations148
- Citation Indexes148
- 148
- CrossRef77
- Captures235
- Readers235
- 235
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Electrolyte derangements in critically ill children receiving balanced versus unbalanced crystalloid fluid resuscitation
Natalja L. Stanski 1,2, Katja M. Gist 2,3, Kaci Pickett 4,5, John T. Brinton 4,5, Jennifer Sadlowski 6, Hector R. Wong 1,2, Peter Mourani 7,8,
Article Description
The present review of fluid therapy studies using balanced solutions versus isotonic saline fluids (both crystalloids and colloids) aims to address recent controversy in this topic. The change to the acid-base equilibrium based on fluid selection is described. Key terms such as dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis (correctly used instead of dilutional acidosis or hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis to account for both the Henderson-Hasselbalch and Stewart equations), isotonic saline and balanced solutions are defined. The review concludes that dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis is a side effect, mainly observed after the administration of large volumes of isotonic saline as a crystalloid. Its effect is moderate and relatively transient, and is minimised by limiting crystalloid administration through the use of colloids (in any carrier). Convincing evidence for clinically relevant adverse effects of dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis on renal function, coagulation, blood loss, the need for transfusion, gastrointestinal function or mortality cannot be found. In view of the long-term use of isotonic saline either as a crystalloid or as a colloid carrier, the paucity of data documenting detrimental effects of dilutional-hyperchloraemic acidosis and the limited published information on the effects of balanced solutions on outcome, we cannot currently recommend changing fluid therapy to the use of a balanced colloid preparation. © 2010 BioMed Central Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79952023093&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9230; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21067552; http://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/cc9230; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc9230; https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/cc9230; https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/cc9230; http://ccforum.com/content/14/5/325; https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/cc9230; http://www.ccforum.com/content/14/5/325
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know