Balancing between dual belongings when organised into interdisciplinary teams, with the trust model as the context: A qualitative study
BMC Primary Care, ISSN: 2731-4553, Vol: 25, Issue: 1, Page: 314
2024
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Background: Home-based healthcare services are facing challenges and pressures of increasing needs due to an ageing population, rising workload for an overburdened workforce, and limited financial resources. The trust model is an approach to address the challenges, by organizing the home-based healthcare services into smaller, autonomous interdisciplinary teams. The aim is to involve users and next of kin in decision-making and trusting frontline workers’ professional judgement, thus making the services more flexible and individually tailored. This study explores frontline workers’ practices and experiences of working within interdisciplinary teams according to the trust model’s goals. Methods: Observations, individual-, and focus groups interviews were conducted within home-based healthcare service in a Norwegian municipality. The participants were leaders and frontline workers at different levels of the home-based healthcare services, including registered nurses, auxiliary nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and other unskilled healthcare personnel. Data was analysed thematically. Results: The results are presented in terms of themes: ‘We all want the best for service users’, ‘Belonging to an interdisciplinary team’ and ‘Maintaining belonging to those with similar work tasks and responsibilities’. The results show a diversity among the participants’ experiences of working within interdisciplinary teams. It demonstrates a dilemma between creating belonging to and forming identities within the interdisciplinary team, and at the same time, the importance of maintaining belonging and identity with those in the same profession or with the same tasks and responsibilities. Conclusion: This study suggests that the frontline workers need for dual belonging seems to be underestimated within the trust model, and by acknowledging this, organisations and policymakers can create environments that support both. Which in turn can enhance the possibility to deliver flexible and individually tailored services for service users.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201952701&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02554-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39182020; https://bmcfampract.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-024-02554-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02554-7; https://bmcprimcare.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12875-024-02554-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know