Importance of optical coherence tomography raster scans in early detection of active fellow-eye neovascularization in unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration
BMC Ophthalmology, ISSN: 1471-2415, Vol: 24, Issue: 1, Page: 359
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Purpose: To investigate the incidence of and risk factors for failure of detection of active fellow-eye neovascularization on optical coherence tomography(OCT) crosshair scans in patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration(AMD). Methods: In this retrospective study, patients who experienced the development of active neovascularization in the fellow eye during the follow-up period were included(n = 75). Cases in which the neovascularization in the fellow eye could be identified solely through crosshair scans were defined as the crosshair scan detection group(n = 63). Cases in which the aforementioned findings could not be identified through crosshair scans but could be identified through raster scans were defined as the raster scan detection group(n = 12). The factors were compared between the two groups. Risk factors related to undetected neovascularization on crosshair scans were additionally identified. Results: Active fellow-eye neovascularization, was not detected on OCT crosshair scans in 12 cases(16.0%) but was identified on raster scans in all cases. There was a significant difference in the proportion of neovascularization types between the crosshair scan detection group and the raster scan detection group(P = 0.023). Among the 35 fellow-eye neovascularization cases in patients with type 3 macular neovascularization(MNV), 10(28.6%) were not detected on crosshair scans. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly higher risk for undetectable fellow-eye neovascularization on crosshair scans in patients with type 3 MNV than in those with typical neovascular AMD(P = 0.037,β = 9.600). Conclusions: Our findings suggest the need for routine OCT raster scans during fellow-eye examinations in patients with unilateral neovascular AMD, particularly when the first-affected eye is diagnosed with type 3 MNV.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85202003480&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03613-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39169293; https://bmcophthalmol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12886-024-03613-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03613-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know