PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The influence of electronic health record use on collaboration among medical specialties

BMC Health Services Research, ISSN: 1472-6963, Vol: 20, Issue: 1, Page: 676
2020
  • 56
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 342
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 2
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    56
  • Captures
    342
  • Mentions
    2
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2
  • Social Media
    2
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      2
      • Facebook
        2

Most Recent News

Integrated Electronic Health Record of Multidisciplinary Professionals Throughout the Cancer Care Pathway: A Pilot Study Exploring Patient-Centered Information in Breast Cancer Patients

Atsuko Sugiyama,1– 3 Hayato Okumiya,1 Katsuhiko Fujimoto,1 Kazuki Utsunomiya,1 Yuka Shimomura,2 Masaru Sanuki,4 Keitaro Kume,4 Takahiro Yano,4 Rina Kagawa,5 Hiroko Bando6 1R&D Planning Office, Canon

Article Description

Background: One of the main objectives of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) is to enhance collaboration among healthcare professionals. However, our knowledge of how EHRs actually affect collaborative practices is limited. This study examines how an EHR facilitates and constrains collaboration in five outpatient clinics. Methods: We conducted an embedded case study at five outpatient clinics of a Dutch hospital that had implemented an organization-wide EHR. Data were collected through interviews with representatives of medical specialties, administration, nursing, and management. Documents were analyzed to contextualize these data. We examined the following collaborative affordances of EHRs: (1) portability, (2) co-located access, (3) shared overviews, (4) mutual awareness, (5) messaging, and (6) orchestrating. Results: Our findings demonstrate how an EHR will both facilitate and constrain collaboration among specialties and disciplines. Affordances that were inscribed in the system for collaboration purposes were not fully actualized in the hospital because: (a) The EHR helps health professionals coordinate patient care on an informed basis at any time and in any place but only allows asynchronous patient record use. (b) The comprehensive patient file affords joint clinical decision-making based on shared data, but specialty- and discipline-specific user-interfaces constrain mutual understanding of that data. Moreover, not all relevant information can be easily shared across specialties and outside the hospital. (c) The reduced necessity for face-to-face communication saves time but is experienced as hindering collective responsibility for a smooth workflow. (d) The EHR affords registration at the source and registration of activities through orders, but the heightened administrative burden for physicians and the strict authorization rules on inputting data constrain the flexible, multidisciplinary collaboration. (e) While the EHR affords a complete overview, information overload occurs due to the parallel generation of individually owned notes and the high frequency of asynchronous communication through messages of varying clinical priority. Conclusions: For the optimal actualization of EHRs' collaborative affordances in hospitals, coordinated use of these affordances by health professionals is a prerequisite. Such coordinated use requires organizational, technical, and behavioral adaptations. Suggestions for hospital-wide policies to enhance trust in both the EHR and in its coordinated use for effective collaboration are offered.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know