An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: A panel study
BMC Medicine, ISSN: 1741-7015, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 131
2014
- 189Citations
- 347Captures
- 6Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations189
- Citation Indexes177
- 177
- CrossRef100
- Policy Citations12
- Policy Citation12
- Captures347
- Readers347
- 347
- Mentions6
- News Mentions3
- News3
- Blog Mentions2
- Blog2
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent Blog
Bad nudges – organ donation edition
It’s a favourite behavioural science story. Countries that have opt-in organ donation have lower rates of organ donation than countries where you have to opt out of being an organ donor. If we change the way the choice is framed from opt in to opt out, we can dramatically increase the rate of organ donation. Except, it’s not that simple. For countries where there is an opt-out system, there is no
Most Recent News
Willingness to donate organs – an anonymised survey in the emergency department
Ksenija Slankamenac, Elijah Temperli, Dagmar I. Keller Summary BACKGROUND: In Switzerland, 519 patients received an organ in 2020. In total, 2124 patients were on the
Article Description
Background: Policy decisions about opt-in and opt-out consent for organ donation are based on limited evidence. To fill this gap we investigated the difference between deceased and living organ donation rates in opt-in and opt-out consent systems across a 13 year period. We controlled for extensive covariates and estimated the causal effect of consent with instrumental variables analysis.Method: This panel study used secondary data analysis to compare organ donor and transplant rates in 48 countries that had either opt-in or opt-out consent. Organ donation data were obtained over a 13-year period between 2000 and 2012. The main outcome measures were the number of donors, number of transplants per organ and total number (deceased plus living) of kidneys and livers transplanted. The role of consent on donor and transplant rates was assessed using multilevel modeling and the causal effect estimated with instrumental variables analysis.Results: Deceased donor rates (per-million population) were higher in opt-out (M = 14.24) than opt-in consent countries (M = 9.98; Β = -4.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -8.08, -0.45, P = .029). However, the number of living donors was higher in opt-in (M = 9.36) than opt-out countries (M = 5.49; B = 3.86, 95% CI = 1.16, 6.56, P = .006). Importantly, the total number of kidneys transplanted (deceased plus living) was higher in opt-out (M = 28.32) than opt-in countries (M = 22.43; B = -5.89, 95% CI = -11.60, -0.17, P = .044). Similarly, the total number of livers transplanted was higher in opt-out (M = 11.26) than opt-in countries (M = 7.53; B = -3.73, 95% CI = -7.47, 0.01, P = .051). Instrumental variables analysis suggested that the effect of opt-in versus opt-out consent on the difference between deceased and living donor rates is causal.Conclusions: While the number of deceased donors is higher than the number of living donors, opt-out consent leads to a relative increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84910033171&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25285666; https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4; http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4; https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4; http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/12/131
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know