Correction to: Construction of cell factory capable of efficiently converting l‑tryptophan into 5‑hydroxytryptamine (Microbial Cell Factories, (2022), 21, 1, (47), 10.1186/s12934-022-01745-0)
Microbial Cell Factories, ISSN: 1475-2859, Vol: 22, Issue: 1, Page: 87
2023
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Correction Description
Unfortunately, the original publication of the article [1] contained the below errors. In Fig. 5, the part Fig. 5c was incorrect and found to be the duplication of Fig. 5e. The corrected Fig. 5 is given below. In “Abstract” under the Results section, the IPTG concentration that reads as “concentration, 0.5 mM” should read as “concentration, 0.05 mM”.In “Methods, under the sub heading “Optimization of the production of 5-HT from L-Trp using E.coli BL21 (DE3) △ tnaA/BH4/HaDDC-SmTPH whole cell factory”,the sentence that reads as “The investment was carried out at varying concentration trajectories of L-Trp (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 g/L), IPTG (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mM)……”, should read as “The investment was carried out at varying concentration trajectories of L-Trp (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 g/L), IPTG (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mM)…….”. The authors apologize for the mistakes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85157987600&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02102-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127644; https://microbialcellfactories.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12934-023-02102-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02102-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know