Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Radiation oncology (London, England), ISSN: 1748-717X, Vol: 17, Issue: 1, Page: 172-null
2022
- 18Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. METHODS: We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. RESULTS: We searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961-1.009, I2 = 0%), 85.8% (95% CI = 0.687-1.030, I2 = 91%), 86% (95% CI = 0.763-0.957, I2 = 85.3%), 91.1% (95% CI = 0.849-0.974), 74.3% (95% CI = 0.666-0.820, I2 = 85.2%), and 64.7% (95% CI = 0.451-0.843, I2 = 95.3%), respectively. The overall survival rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 99.9% (95% CI = 0.995-1.004, I2 = 0%), 89.6% (95% CI = 0.811-0.980, I2 = 96.6%), 85% (95% CI = 0.750-0.950, I2 = 89.4%), 92.4% (95% CI = 0.866-0.982), 72.7% (95% CI = 0.609-0.844, I2 = 95.3%), and 72.1% (95% CI = 0.661-0.781, I2 = 46.5%), respectively. Across all studies, the incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1 to grade 2, and grade 1 to grade 3, respectively. CONCLUSION: As an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021258480.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140692428&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284346; https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know