Patient preferences for emergency or planned hip fracture surgery: A cross-sectional study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, ISSN: 1749-799X, Vol: 11, Issue: 1, Page: 120
2016
- 5Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Background: The ideal timing of surgical management for hip fractures remains controversial. Currently, individual surgeon preference and departmental resources guide decision making regarding the use of emergency or planned operating lists for hip fracture surgery. We evaluated patient preference for emergency or planned surgery. Methods: 102 patients awaiting surgery for a hip fracture at a tertiary hospital were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. After being informed of the benefits and risks associated with an emergency or planned operation, the patients were asked to indicate a hypothetical preference for surgical operating time. They were then asked to give an importance value for six factors that may influence decision making including consultant supervision, operative timeliness, surgical cancellation, after hours operation, length of hospital stay and repeated fasting. For each factor, absolute importance was rated from 0 to 10, and factors were independently ranked for relative importance from 1 to 6. An open ended question was used to include any other factors they thought relevant to their hypothetical decision making. Results: Of the 102 patients surveyed, 95 patients (93%) indicated that they preferred planned over emergency surgery. The most important influencing factor was the presence of specialist supervision (mean rating 9.4, mean rank 1.3) followed by avoidance of operative cancellation (mean rating 8.8, mean rank 2.3) and avoidance of after hours operations (mean rating 8.1, mean rank 3.2). A lower importance was attached to operative timeliness and avoiding prolonged fasting, with reduction in length of hospital stay being the least important variable. There was a direct correlation between absolute ratings and relative rankings independently assigned by patients to each factor. Conclusions: Patients with hip fractures prefer planned rather than emergency surgery, the presence of specialist supervision being the most important factor influencing their preference.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992146687&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0454-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27751182; http://josr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13018-016-0454-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0454-2; https://josr-online.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13018-016-0454-2
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know