Intensive breast screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with reduced breast cancer specific and all cause mortality
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, ISSN: 1897-4287, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 8
2016
- 48Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations48
- Citation Indexes48
- 48
- CrossRef3
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
Article Description
Background: The addition of annual MRI screening to mammography has heightened optimism that intensive screening along with improved treatments may substantially improve life expectancy of women at high risk of breast cancer. However, survival data from BRCA2 mutation carriers undergoing intensive combined breast screening are scarce. Methods: We have collated the results of screening with either annual mammography or mammography with MRI in female BRCA2 mutation carriers in Manchester and Oslo and use a Manchester control group of BRCA2 mutation carriers who had their first breast cancer diagnosed without intensive screening. Results: Eighty-seven BRCA2 mutation carriers had undergone combined (n = 34) or mammography (n = 53) screening compared to 274 without such intensive screening. Ten year breast cancer specific survival was 100 % in the combined group (95 % CI 82.5-100 %) and 85.5 % (95 % CI 72.6-98.4 %) in the mammography group compared to 74.6 % (95 % CI 66.6-82.6 %) in the control group. Better survival was driven by lymph node status (negative in 67 % of screened vs 39 % of unscreened women; p < 0.001) and a significantly greater proportion of intensively screened women had invasive breast cancers <2 cm at diagnosis (74.6 % vs 50.4 %; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Intensive combined breast cancer screening with annual MRI and mammography appears to improve survival from breast cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Data from larger groups are required to confirm the effectiveness of combined screening in BRCA2 carriers.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84963627730&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27087880; http://hccpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; https://hccpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3/fulltext.html; https://link.springer.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; https://link.springer.com/articles/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3; https://hccpjournal.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know