Correction to: Nrf2 activation rescues stress-induced depression-like behaviour and inflammatory responses in male but not female rats (Biology of Sex Differences, (2024), 15, 1, (16), 10.1186/s13293-024-00589-0)
Biology of Sex Differences, ISSN: 2042-6410, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 31
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Correction Description
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the methodology for calculating the discrimination ratio in the novel object recognition and object location tests. Incorrect: The discrimination ratio was calculated as the time of exploration of relocated object/total object exploration time*100. Correct: For the novel object recognition test the discrimination ratio was calculated as the time exploring the novel object – the time exploring the familiar object/total exploration time. For the object location test the discrimination ratio was calculated as the time exploring the novel location – the time exploring the familiar location/total exploration time. The authors also report an error in sampling for original Figs. 4 and 5. Therefore, all of the original microglia data in the results and figures have been removed and Fig. 6 renumbered as Fig. 4. The associated immunohistochemistry methodologies were removed, and any associated discussion of the microglia findings deleted. References were renumbered and the Abstract and Highlights also revised to remove the microglia findings.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know