Proton NMR characterization of intact primary and metastatic melanoma cells in 2D & 3D cultures
Biological Research, ISSN: 0717-6287, Vol: 50, Issue: 1, Page: 12
2017
- 9Citations
- 1,005Usage
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef5
- Usage1,005
- Full Text Views839
- 839
- Abstract Views166
- 166
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Objective: To characterize the differences between the primary and metastatic melanoma cell lines grown in 2D cultures and 3D cultures. Methods: Primary melanoma cells (WM115) and metastatic melanoma cells (WM266) extracted from a single donor was cultured in 2D as well as 3D cultures. These cells were characterized using proton NMR spectrometry, and the qualitative chemical shifts markers were identified and discussed. Results: In monolayer culture (2D), we observed one qualitative chemical shift marker for primary melanoma cells. In spheroid cultures (3D), we observed nine significant chemical shifts, of which eight markers were specific for primary melanoma spheroids, whereas the other one marker was specific to metastatic melanoma spheroids. This study suggests that the glucose accumulation and phospholipid composition vary significantly between the primary and metastatic cells lines that are obtained from a single donor and also with the cell culturing methods. 14 qualitative chemical shift markers were obtained in the comparison between monolayer culture and spheroids cultures irrespective of the differences in the cell lines. Among which 4 were unique to monolayer cultures whereas 10 chemical shifts were unique to the spheroid cultures. This study also shows that the method of cell culture would drastically affect the phospholipid composition of the cells and also depicts that the cells in spheroid culture closely resembles the cells in vivo. Conclusion: This study shows the high specificity of proton NMR spectrometry in characterizing cancer cell lines and also shows the variations in the glucose accumulation and phospholipid composition between the primary and metastatic melanoma cell lines from the same donor. Differences in the cell culture method does plays an important role in phospholipid composition of the cells.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85016229822&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40659-017-0117-8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28302167; http://biolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40659-017-0117-8; http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602017000100208&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0716-97602017000100208&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-97602017000100208; http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0716-97602017000100208; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40659-017-0117-8; https://biolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40659-017-0117-8; https://biolres.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s40659-017-0117-8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know