Three-dimensional regularized inversion of DC resistivity data with different stabilizing functionals
Geophysics, ISSN: 1942-2156, Vol: 83, Issue: 6, Page: E399-E407
2018
- 20Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A regularized inversion with a smoothing (SM) stabilizer is commonly used in 3D inversion of direct-current (DC) resistivity data. We have developed a new 3D inversion algorithm for DC resistivity data to investigate the efficiency of various stabilizing functionals. This algorithm is capable of incorporating 3D regularized inversion with L1-norm, L2-norm, SM, minimum support (MS), minimum gradient support (MGS), first-order minimum entropy, and total variation (TV) stabilizers. This is, to our knowledge, a comprehensive study of the effects of these seven different stabilizers on the inverse solution using synthetic and field data. As expected, the structure boundaries are found to be smooth when a SM stabilizer is used in the synthetic data examples. The upper bounds of the structures are recovered close to true model with L1-norm, L2-norm, first-order minimum entropy, and TV stabilizers, but the lower bounds cannot be recovered. Moreover, these stabilizers cannot completely resolve the resistivity of structures. The boundaries and resistivity of the structures are determined to be close to the true model with MS and MGS stabilizers. Similar results are obtained from inversions of field data collected in the Kültepe archaeological site (Kayseri, Turkey). A buried wall structure is correctly identified when the inversion used MS or MGS stabilizers. The archaeological structure found in the excavation studies reveals the success of the solution using MS and MGS stabilizers. These two stabilizers are recommended for an exploration of sharp boundaries structures.
Bibliographic Details
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know