Plant sterol or stanol esters retard lesion formation in LDL receptor-deficient mice independent of changes in serum plant sterols
Journal of Lipid Research, ISSN: 0022-2275, Vol: 47, Issue: 12, Page: 2762-2771
2006
- 51Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations51
- Citation Indexes50
- 50
- CrossRef35
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
Statins do not always decrease coronary heart disease mortality, which was speculated based on increased serum plant sterols observed during statin treatment. To evaluate plant sterol atherogenicity, we fed low density lipoprotein-receptor deficient (LDLr +/− ) mice for 35 weeks with Western diets (control) alone or enriched with atorvastatin or atorvastatin plus plant sterols or stanols. Atorvastatin decreased serum cholesterol by 22% and lesion area by 57%. Adding plant sterols or stanols to atorvastatin decreased serum cholesterol by 39% and 41%. Cholesterol-standardized serum plant sterol concentrations increased by 4- to 11-fold during sterol plus atorvastatin treatment versus stanol plus atorvastatin treatment. However, lesion size decreased similarly in the sterol plus atorvastatin (−99% vs. control) and the stanol plus atorvastatin (−98%) groups, with comparable serum cholesterol levels, suggesting that increased plant sterol concentrations are not atherogenic. Our second study confirms this conclusion. Compared with lesions after a 33 week atherogenic period, lesion size further increased in controls (+97%) during 12 more weeks on the diet, whereas 12 weeks with the addition of plant sterols or stanols decreased lesion size (66% and 64%). These findings indicate that in LDLr +/− mice 1 ) increased cholesterol-standardized serum plant sterol concentrations are not atherogenic, 2 ) adding plant sterols/stanols to atorvastatin further inhibits lesion formation, and 3 ) plant sterols/stanols inhibit the progression or even induce the regression of existing lesions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022227520432687; http://dx.doi.org/10.1194/jlr.m600346-jlr200; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845563662&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16957178; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022227520432687; http://www.jlr.org/lookup/doi/10.1194/jlr.M600346-JLR200; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1194/jlr.M600346-JLR200; https://dx.doi.org/10.1194/jlr.m600346-jlr200; http://www.jlr.org/content/47/12/2762; http://www.jlr.org/article/S0022227520432687/abstract; http://www.jlr.org/article/S0022227520432687/fulltext; http://www.jlr.org/article/S0022227520432687/pdf; https://www.jlr.org/article/S0022-2275(20)43268-7/abstract; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/16957178; https://www.jlr.org/content/47/12/2762; http://www.jlr.org/cgi/doi/10.1194/jlr.M600346-JLR200; http://www.jlr.org/content/47/12/2762.abstract; http://www.jlr.org/content/47/12/2762.full; http://www.jlr.org/content/47/12/2762.full.pdf
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know