The C-MAC Videolaryngoscope: First Experiences with a New Device for Videolaryngoscopy-Guided Intubation
Anesthesia and Analgesia, ISSN: 0003-2999, Vol: 110, Issue: 2, Page: 473-477
2010
- 101Citations
- 64Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations101
- Citation Indexes101
- 101
- CrossRef64
- Captures64
- Readers64
- 64
Article Description
We studied the efficacy of the C-MAC® (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany), a new portable videolaryngoscope, in 60 patients during routine induction of anesthesia. It was possible to insert the blade (Size 3) of the C-MAC and to get a view of the glottis on the first attempt in all patients. Tracheal intubation also was successful in all 60 patients; 52 patients were intubated on the first attempt, 6 on the second, and 2 on the third. In 8 patients (13%), a gum elastic bougie guide was required. A Cormack-Lehane Class 1 view of the glottis was seen in 30 patients without external manipulation and in 45 with external manipulation, Class 2a view in 22 without and 12 with, Class 2b in 2 without, and Class 3 in 2 without manipulation. The median time taken for tracheal intubation was 16 s (range, 6–58 s). In addition, we describe our experience with 3 patients in whom we had unexpected difficulty with direct laryngoscopy with a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (Cormack-Lehane Class 3, 4, and 4, respectively). These patients' airways were successfully managed on the first attempt when using the C-MAC Size 4 blade (improvement to Cormack-Lehane Class 1, 2a, and 2b, respectively) in a modified manner by uploading the epiglottis, which is known as “straight blade technique.”
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003299910600378; http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181c5bce5; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=76249129687&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917623; https://journals.lww.com/00000539-201002000-00037; https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181c5bce5; https://insights.ovid.com/ShowUpgradeBrowserMessage
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know