Cervical spinal cord therapeutics delivery: Preclinical safety validation of a stabilized microinjection platform
Neurosurgery, ISSN: 0148-396X, Vol: 65, Issue: 4, Page: 754-761
2009
- 54Citations
- 33Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes54
- 54
- CrossRef48
- Captures33
- Readers33
- 28
Article Description
OBJECTIVE: The current series represents a preclinical safety validation study for direct parenchymal microinjection of cellular grafts into the ventral horn of the porcine cervical spinal cord. METHODS: Twenty-four 30- to 40-kg female Yorkshire farm pigs immunosuppressed with cyclosporine underwent a cervical laminectomy and ventral horn human neural progenitor cell injection. Cell transplantation in groups 1 to 3 (n = 6 pigs each) was undertaken with the intent of assessing the safety of varied injection volumes: 10, 25, and 50 μL injected at 1, 2.5, and 5 μL/min, respectively. Groups 4 and 5 (n = 3 pigs each) received prolonged immunosuppressant pretreatment in an attempt to demonstrate graft viability. The latter was undertaken in an alternate species (mini-pig versus Yorkshire pig). RESULTS: Neurological morbidity was observed in 1 animal and was attributable to the presence of a resolving epidural hematoma noted at necropsy. Although instances of ventral horn targeting were achieved in all injection groups with a coordinate-based approach, opportunities exist for improvement in accuracy and precision. A relationship between injection volume and graft site cross-sectional area suggested limited reflux. Only animals from group 5 achieved graft survival at a survival end point (t = 1 week). CONCLUSION: This series demonstrated the functional safety of targeted ventral horn microinjection despite evidence for graft site immune rejection. Improvements in graft delivery may be augmented with an adapter to improve control of the cannula entry angle, intraoperative imaging, or larger graft volumes. Finally, demonstration of long-term graft viability in future preclinical toxicity studies may require tailored immunosuppressive therapies, an allograft construct, or tailored choice of host species. Copyright © by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349730271&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000343524.45387.9e; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349731957&origin=inward; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=70349736412&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19834381; https://journals.lww.com/00006123-200910000-00014; https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-lookup/doi/10.1227/01.NEU.0000343524.45387.9E; http://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-pdf/65/4/754/16847361/neurosurgery-65-4-754.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000343524.45387.9e; https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/65/4/754/2555753?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know