Comments
Neurosurgery, ISSN: 0148-396X, Vol: 66, Issue: 4, Page: 687-null
2010
- 177Citations
- 57Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations177
- Citation Indexes177
- 177
- CrossRef119
- Captures57
- Readers57
- 57
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Posterior Compression Distraction Reduction (CDR)Technique in the Treatment of BI-AAD; CDR
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Posterior Compression - Distraction Reduction (CDR) Technique in the Treatment of Basilar Invagination Associated With Atlantoaxial Dislocation CURRENT STATUS: Unknown status
Article Description
OBJECTIVE: To report the surgical technique and clinical results for the treatment of basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) by direct posterior reduction and fixation using intraoperative distraction between the occiput and C2 pedicle screws. METHODS: From May 2004 to June 2008, 29 patients who had BI with AAD were surgically treated in our department. Pre- and postoperative dynamic cervical x-rays, computed tomographic scans, and 3-dimensional reconstruction views were performed to assess the degree of dislocation. Ventral compression of the cervicomedullary junction was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. For all patients, reduction of the AAD was conducted by intraoperative distraction between the occiput and C2 pedicle screws using a direct posterior approach. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 6 to 50 months in 28 patients. Clinical symptoms improved in 26 patients (92.9%) and were stable in 2 patients (7.1%) without postoperative deterioration. Radiologically, complete or more than 50% reduction was achieved in 27 of 28 patients (96.4%). In 1 patient, the reduction was less than 50% because the direction of the facets on 1 side of the C1-C2 joint was vertically oriented, instead of horizontal. Overall, good decompression and bone fusion were shown on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or x-ray scans for all patients. There was 1 death in the series because of basilar artery thrombosis 1 week after the operation. CONCLUSION: The direct posterior distraction technique between occiput and C2 pedicle screws is an effective, simple, fast, and safe method for the treatment of BI with AAD. Transoral odontoidectomy and cervical traction for the treatment of BI with AAD should be reconsidered. Copyright © 2010 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949962629&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000367632.45384.5a; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949993249&origin=inward; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77949937422&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20305492; https://journals.lww.com/00006123-201004000-00019; https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-lookup/doi/10.1227/01.NEU.0000367632.45384.5A; http://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-pdf/66/4/678/16847480/00006123-201004000-00019.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000367632.45384.5a; https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article/66/4/678/2680752
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know