Cardiac preload and venous return in swimming sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.)
Journal of Experimental Biology, ISSN: 0022-0949, Vol: 208, Issue: 10, Page: 1927-1935
2005
- 48Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations48
- Citation Indexes48
- 48
- CrossRef39
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Cardiac preload (central venous pressure, PCV), mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP), dorsal aortic blood pressure (PDA) and relative cardiac output (Q̇) were measured in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) at rest and while swimming at 1 and 2 BL s. MCFP, an index of venous capacitance and the upstream venous pressure driving the return of venous blood to the heart, was measured as the plateau in Pcv during ventral aortic occlusion. Compared with resting values, swimming at 1 and 2 BL s increased Q̇ (by 15±1.5 and 38±6.5%, respectively), PCV (from 0.11±0.01 kPa to 0.12±0.01 and 0.16±0.02 kPa, respectively), MCFP (from 0.27±0.02 kPa to 0.31±0.02 and 0.40±0.04 kPa, respectively) and the calculated pressure gradient for venous return (ΔPV, from 0.16±0.01 kPa to 0.18±0.02 and 0.24±0.02 kPa, respectively), but not PDA. In spite of an increased preload, the increase in Q̇ was exclusively mediated by an increased heart rate (fH, from 80±4 beats min to 88±4 and 103±3 beats min, respectively), and stroke volume (V) remained unchanged. Prazosin treatment (1 mg kg M) abolished pressure and flow changes during swimming at 1 BL s, but not 2 BL s, indicating that other control systems besides an α-adrenoceptor control are involved. This study is the first to address the control of venous capacitance in swimming fish. It questions the generality that increased Q̇ during swimming is regulated primarily through V and shows that an increased cardiac filling pressure does not necessarily lead to an increased V in fish, but may instead compensate for a reduced cardiac filling time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=20444431977&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01606; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879073; https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/208/10/1927/15327/Cardiac-preload-and-venous-return-in-swimming-sea; https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01606; https://jeb.biologists.org/content/208/10/1927
The Company of Biologists
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know