It's all in the gills: Evaluation of O2 uptake in Pacific hagfish refutes a major respiratory role for the skin
Journal of Experimental Biology, ISSN: 0022-0949, Vol: 219, Issue: 18, Page: 2814-2818
2016
- 17Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef12
- Captures24
- Readers24
- 24
Article Description
Hagfish skin has been reported as an important site for ammonia excretion and as the major site of systemic oxygen acquisition. However, whether cutaneous O uptake is the dominant route of uptake remains under debate; all evidence supporting this hypothesis has been derived using indirect measurements. Here, we used partitioned chambers and direct measurements of oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion to quantify cutaneous and branchial exchanges in Pacific hagfish (Eptatretus stoutii) at rest and following exhaustive exercise. Hagfish primarily relied on the gills for both O uptake (81.0%) and ammonia excretion (70.7%). Following exercise, both O uptake and ammonia excretion increased, but only across the gill; cutaneous exchange was not increased. When branchial O availability was reduced by exposure to anteriorly localized hypoxia (4.6 kPa O), cutaneous O consumption was only slightly elevated on an absolute basis. These results refute a major role for cutaneous O2 acquisition in the Pacific hagfish.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988697495&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.141598; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27401763; https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/doi/10.1242/jeb.141598/262330/It-s-all-in-the-gills-Evaluation-of-O2-uptake-in; https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.141598; https://jeb.biologists.org/content/219/18/2814
The Company of Biologists
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know