Climate impacts on organisms, ecosystems and human societies: integrating OCLTT into a wider context
Journal of Experimental Biology, ISSN: 1477-9145, Vol: 224, Issue: Pt Suppl 1
2021
- 61Citations
- 90Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations61
- Citation Indexes59
- 59
- CrossRef45
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures90
- Readers90
- 90
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Making a difference: comparative biologists tackle climate change
Journal of Experimental Biology publishes a collection of Reviews dedicated to strategies for, and predictions of, the impact of climate change. Focusing on the role of physiology in the ability of animals to tolerate and adapt, the collection discusses the impact of climate change on species ranging from polar bears and narwhals, to birds, reptiles, corals, fish and insects, outlining the challen
Review Description
Physiological studies contribute to a cause and effect understanding of ecological patterns under climate change and identify the scope and limits of adaptation. Across most habitats, this requires analyzing organism responses to warming, which can be modified by other drivers such as acidification and oxygen loss in aquatic environments or excess humidity or drought on land. Experimental findings support the hypothesis that the width and temperature range of thermal performance curves relate to biogeographical range. Current warming causes range shifts, hypothesized to include constraints in aerobic power budget which in turn are elicited by limitations in oxygen supply capacity in relation to demand. Different metabolic scopes involved may set the borders of both the fundamental niche (at standard metabolic rate) and the realized niche (at routine rate). Relative scopes for aerobic performance also set the capacity of species to interact with others at the ecosystem level. Niche limits and widths are shifting and probably interdependent across life stages, with young adults being least thermally vulnerable. The principles of thermal tolerance and performance may also apply to endotherms including humans, their habitat and human society. Overall, phylogenetically based comparisons would need to consider the life cycle of species as well as organism functional properties across climate zones and time scales. This Review concludes with a perspective on how mechanismbased understanding allows scrutinizing often simplified modeling approaches projecting future climate impacts and risks for aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. It also emphasizes the usefulness of a consensus-building process among experimentalists for better recognition in the climate debate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102098176&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.238360; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33627467; https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/224/Suppl_1/jeb238360/237195/Climate-impacts-on-organisms-ecosystems-and-human; https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.238360; https://jeb.biologists.org/content/224/Suppl_1/jeb238360
The Company of Biologists
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know