E-cadherin expression pattern during zebrafish embryonic epidermis development
F1000Research, ISSN: 1759-796X, Vol: 7, Issue: 1489, Page: 1489
2019
- 5Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Captures20
- Readers20
Article Description
Background: E-cadherin is the major adhesion receptor in epithelial adherens junctions (AJs). On established epidermis, E-cadherin performs fine-tuned cell-cell contact remodeling to maintain tissue integrity, which is characterized by modulation of cell shape, size and packing density. In zebrafish, the organization and distribution of E-cadherin in AJs during embryonic epidermis development remain scarcely described. Methods: Combining classical immunofluorescence, deconvolution microscopy and 3D-segmentation of AJs in epithelial cells, a quantitative approach was implemented to assess the spatial and temporal distribution of E-cadherin across zebrafish epidermis between 24 and 72 hpf. Results: increasing levels of E-cadh protein parallel higher cell density and the appearance of hexagonal cells in the enveloping layer (EVL) as well as the establishments of new cell-cell contacts in the epidermal basal layer (EBL), being significantly between 31 and 48 hpf. Conclusions: Increasing levels of E-cadherin in AJs correlates with extensive changes in cell morphology towards hexagonal packing during the epidermis morphogenesis.
Bibliographic Details
10.12688/f1000research.15932.3; 10.12688/f1000research.15932.1; 10.12688/f1000research.15932.2; 10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217819; 10.5256/f1000research.15932.d236505; 10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217820; 10.5256/f1000research.15932.d228659; 10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217821
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057104664&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473778; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v3; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1; http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.1; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v2; http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.2; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1#DS0; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v3#DS2; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1#DS1; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v2#DS2; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1#DS2; https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.3; http://dx.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15932.d228659; http://dx.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15932.d236505; https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.1; http://dx.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217820; https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15932.2; http://dx.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217819; http://dx.doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.15932.d217821; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1/pdf; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/pdf; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v3/iparadigms; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v3/pdf; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v2/iparadigms; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v2/pdf; https://f1000research.com/articles/7-1489/v1/iparadigms
F1000 Research Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know