Embodied conversational agents: Artificial intelligence for autonomous learning
Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educacion, ISSN: 2171-7966, Issue: 62, Page: 107-144
2021
- 15Citations
- 228Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- Captures228
- Readers228
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
La inteligencia artificial y su producción científica en el campo de la educación.
Artificial intelligence and its scientific production in the area of education INTRODUCCIÓN Esta investigación consiste en una revisión bibliográfica enmarcada en el campo de la
Article Description
This paper delves into the possibilities of conversational virtual agents as a tool to tutor university students' work. A quantitative methodology with a descriptive, correlational and differential design was used to evaluate the usability of the conversational agent in a sample of 303 university students. For this, a virtual conversational agent was designed and evaluated to support the End-of-Degree Project tutorials with the SUS Scale (System Usability Scale). The results indicate that the scale has a satisfactory metric quality and good model goodness, aspects that are verified in the empirical structure and in the favorable internal consistency of the questionnaire. The data also show that there are significant differences (99.95% CI) in the variables gender, grade, level of knowledge, and the grade of chatbot use. It was completed with the record of the actual use of the agent, within a period of six months, by 589 students from three different degrees, answering 3025 questions in six months. In conclusion, the results allow to establish explanatory criteria on the use of chatbots. It is necessary to continue deepening in this type of tools for the monitoring and evaluation of students.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know