Comparison between auscultatory and oscillometric reading of blood pressure measurement while in sitting and supine position
Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, ISSN: 2456-2610, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 775-781
2019
- 1Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Due to continuous debate of incompatible results of blood pressure by the two devices such as the automated oscillometer and the traditional mercury sphygmomanometer, a study was carried out to compare the accuracy of the two devices as well as the best position to measure blood pressure. A comparative study regarding the difference in values of BP (mmHg) between traditional auscultatory method and automated oscillometric readings in supine and sitting positions was conducted among medical students. Oscillometer produced high readings than the readings of sphygmomanometer. Besides, the blood pressure readings for systolic and diastolic are higher while sitting when compared to supine position as the blood is unevenly distributed to all part of the body in sitting position. This will lead to the increase in ionotropic effect of the heart to pump blood towards the upper part of the body. The differences between two methods showed there have a major problem or error in measuring blood pressure. It is therefore necessary to improve the method and ways to check the health especially in this area where slight differences may contribute to large errors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069560895&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1699; http://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol12no2/comparison-between-auscultatory-and-oscillometric-reading-of-blood-pressure-measurement-while-in-sitting-and-supine-position/; https://dx.doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1699; https://biomedpharmajournal.org/vol12no2/comparison-between-auscultatory-and-oscillometric-reading-of-blood-pressure-measurement-while-in-sitting-and-supine-position/
Oriental Scientific Publishing Company
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know