Registry stakeholders
EFORT Open Reviews, ISSN: 2058-5241, Vol: 4, Issue: 6, Page: 330-336
2019
- 22Citations
- 129Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef16
- Captures129
- Readers129
- 129
Article Description
□ Clinical registries are health information systems, which have the mission to collect multidimensional real-world data over the long term, and to generate relevant information and actionable knowledge to address current serious healthcare problems.□This article provides an overview of clinical registries and their relevant stakeholders, focussing on registry structure and functioning, each stakeholder's specific interests, and on their involvement in the registry's information input and output. □ Stakeholders of clinical registries include the patients, healthcare providers (professionals and facilities), financiers (government, insurance companies), public health and regulatory agencies, industry, the research community and the media. □ The article discusses (1) challenges in stakeholder interaction and how to strengthen the central role of the patient, (2) the importance of adding cost reporting to enable informed value choices, and (3) the need for proof of clinical and public health utility of registries. □ In its best form, a registry is a mission-driven, independent stakeholder-registry team collaboration that enables rapid, transparent and open-access knowledge generation and dissemination.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066948544&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31210971; https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/4/6/2058-5241.4.180077.xml; https://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077; https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/full/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180077
Bioscientifica
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know