Clutching at straws: Is it time to abandon the moral judgment deficit explanation for delinquency?
British Journal of Developmental Psychology, ISSN: 0261-510X, Vol: 25, Issue: 2, Page: 191-195
2007
- 8Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We respond to the commentary by Brusten, Stams, and Gibbs (2007) on the research by Tarry and Emler (2007), arguing for the appropriateness of key design decisions -studying delinquency as assessed by self-report in a sample of 12- to 15-year-old males. We argue that 'known-group' methods for assessing involvement in delinquency, the major alternatives to self-report, produce divergent results with respect to moral judgment level because these methods are confounded with other influences on moral judgment level, in particular education. © 2007 The British Psychological Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34548428701&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151007x178084; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1348/026151007X178084; http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjdp/2007/00000025/00000002/art00003; https://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1348%2F026151007X178084; https://dx.doi.org/10.1348/026151007x178084; https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1348/026151007X178084
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know