The rational design of mRNA vaccine: From empirical method to artificial intelligence-based design
Kexue Tongbao/Chinese Science Bulletin, ISSN: 2095-9419, Vol: 69, Issue: 33, Page: 4805-4812
2024
- 2Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef1
Article Description
mRNA vaccines, recognized for their strong immunogenicity, low risk of gene integration, and cost-effective manufacturing, hold significant promise in preventing and treating infectious diseases and cancers. Indeed, mRNA vaccines were among the earliest vaccine platforms developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrating robust immunogenicity and playing a crucial role in protecting countless lives from COVID-19 infection. However, they also face practical challenges such as poor stability and suboptimal protein expression efficiency. To overcome these challenges, extensive research has focused on the design and optimization of mRNA vaccines. Traditionally, this design process has relied on iterative empirical refinements. With advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and bioinformatics, mRNA vaccine design is evolving toward more rational and efficient approaches. Thus, this review systematically introduces the characteristics of various vaccines and outlines the principles of mRNA vaccine design. We then focus on the optimization of mRNA vaccines, examining both empirical and AI-based design methods across five key structural domains of mRNA, including the 5' cap, 5' untranslated region (UTR), 3' UTR, coding sequence region, and poly-A tail. Traditional empirical methods involve designing and optimizing these regions to address some of the inherent deficiencies in mRNA vaccines. However, these methods often require repetitive experimental iterations, resulting in low development efficiency and high costs. Currently, the evolvement of vaccines is rapidly being revolutionized using advanced AI-based technologies. AI models can rapidly and efficiently optimize and generate highly druggable mRNA sequences by learning from publicly available or proprietary biological data. By comparing empirical and AI-based design approaches, we highlight the advantages of AI in mRNA vaccine design while also discussing its limitations and future potential. Centainly, AI models also face certain challenges when applied to mRNA design. Firstly, AI models require large-scale and high-quality experimental data for training, but currently, the available experimental data is limited in quantity, varies in quality, and is also scattered. Secondly, the interpretability of AI models is relatively poor, as they are often referred to as “black box” models, making it difficult to explain the decision-making processes of AI models. With the development of AI technology and the accumulation of biological data, the predictive capabilities of AI models will keep improving. It is even more foreseeable that base models based on large language models, such as AlphaFold3, targeting biomolecules like RNA and proteins, will play a significant role in drug development. AI models will be able to more comprehensively analyze the interaction patterns between RNA and other biomolecules like DNA and proteins, thereby further enhancing the effectiveness of mRNA design. In conclusion, we argue that personalized and precise mRNA design driven by AI could revolutionize the biomedical field, offering unprecedented therapeutic possibilities for patients, enhancing the vaccine development process, and providing new strategies to address future challenges.
Bibliographic Details
Science China Press., Co. Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know