Model transfer method based on piecewise direct standardization in laser-induced-breakdown spectroscopy
Applied Optics, ISSN: 2155-3165, Vol: 61, Issue: 30, Page: 9069-9077
2022
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A large number of certified samples are usually required to build models in the quantitative analysis of complicated matrices in laser-induced-breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Because of differences among instruments, including excitation and collection efficiencies, a quantitative model made on one instrument is difficult to apply directly to other instruments. Each instrument requires a large number of samples to model, which is very labor intensive and will hinder the rapid application of the LIBS technique. To eliminate the differences in spectral data from different instruments and reduce the cost of building new models, a piecewise direct standardization method combined with partial least squares (PLS_PDS) is studied in this work. Two portable LIBS instruments with the same configuration are used to obtain spectral data, one of which is called a master instrument because its calibration model is directly built on a large number of labeled samples, and the other of which is called a slave instrument because its model is obtained from the master instrument. The PLS_PDS method is used to build a transfer function of spectra between the master instrument and slave instrument to reduce the spectral difference between two instruments, and thus one calibration model can adapt to different instruments. Results show that for multiple elemental analyses of aluminium alloy samples, the number of samples required for slave modeling was reduced from 51 to 14 after model transferring by PLS_PDS, and the quantitative performance of the slave instrument was close to that of the master instrument. Therefore, the model transfer method can obviously reduce the sample number of building models for slave instruments, and it will be beneficial to advance the application of LIBS.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140854220&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.471891; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36607036; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-61-30-9069; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ao.471891; https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-61-30-9069
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know