Making ophthalmic AO imaging more adaptive
Optics InfoBase Conference Papers, ISSN: 2162-2701
2013
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
Ophthalmic Adaptive Optics imaging technology in the living eyes of humans and animals is rapidly maturing. By manipulating optical elements in addition to the deformable mirror and introducing auxiliary image sensors, a number of improvements can be incorporated into multimodal clinical and laboratory AO systems. These include better focus control and focal plane tilt tuning, pupil tracking, simplified AO calibration methods with non-common path aberrations, 3D point-spread function and image quality metrics. © OSA 2013.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089110564&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/aopt.2013.om4a.1; https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?uri=AOPT-2013-OM4A.1; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=AOPT-2013-OM4A.1&seq=0; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=AOPT-2013-OM4A.1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/aopt.2013.om4a.1
The Optical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know