Preserving shape details of pulse signals for video-based blood pressure estimation
Biomedical Optics Express, ISSN: 2156-7085, Vol: 15, Issue: 4, Page: 2433-2450
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
In recent years, imaging photoplethysmograph (iPPG) pulse signals have been widely used in the research of non-contact blood pressure (BP) estimation, in which BP estimation based on pulse features is the main research direction. Pulse features are directly related to the shape of pulse signals while iPPG pulse signals are easily disturbed during the extraction process. To mitigate the impact of pulse feature distortion on BP estimation, it is necessary to eliminate interference while retaining valuable shape details in the iPPG pulse signal. Contact photoplethysmograph (cPPG) pulse signals measured at rest can be considered as the undisturbed reference signal. Transforming the iPPG pulse signal to the corresponding cPPG pulse signal is a method to ensure the effectiveness of shape details. However, achieving the required shape accuracy through direct transformation from iPPG to the corresponding cPPG pulse signals is challenging. We propose a method to mitigate this challenge by replacing the reference signal with an average cardiac cycle (ACC) signal, which can approximately represent the shape information of all cardiac cycles in a short time. A neural network using multi-scale convolution and self-attention mechanisms is developed for this transformation. Our method demonstrates a significant improvement in the maximal information coefficient (MIC) between pulse features and BP values, indicating a stronger correlation. Moreover, pulse signals transformed by our method exhibit enhanced performance in BP estimation using different model types. Experiments are conducted on a real-world database with 491 subjects in the hospital, averaging 60 years of age.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191345116&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.516388; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38633075; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-15-4-2433; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.516388; https://opg.optica.org/boe/fulltext.cfm?uri=boe-15-4-2433&id=548036
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know