Compensation of modeling errors due to unknown domain boundary in diffuse optical tomography
Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, ISSN: 1520-8532, Vol: 31, Issue: 8, Page: 1847-1855
2014
- 19Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Diffuse optical tomography is a highly unstable problem with respect to modeling and measurement errors. During clinical measurements, the body shape is not always known, and an approximate model domain has to be employed. The use of an incorrect model domain can, however, lead to significant artifacts in the reconstructed images. Recently, the Bayesian approximation error theory has been proposed to handle model-based errors. In this work, the feasibility of the Bayesian approximation error approach to compensate for modeling errors due to unknown body shape is investigated. The approach is tested with simulations. The results show that the Bayesian approximation error method can be used to reduce artifacts in reconstructed images due to unknown domain shape. © 2014 Optical Society of America.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929048492&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josaa.31.001847; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25121542; https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-8-1847; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=josaa-31-8-1847&seq=0; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-31-8-1847; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josaa.31.001847; https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-31-8-1847
The Optical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know