Study of an underwater accurate channel model considering comprehensive misalignment errors
Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision, ISSN: 1520-8532, Vol: 39, Issue: 6, Page: 1014-1024
2022
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In an actual scene, underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) transceivers may not be perfectly aligned from the start due to imprecise operation or disturbances such as water flow, and thus outdated pointing errors can no longer reliably reflect precise channel conditions. In this paper, for the first time, to our knowledge,we formulate a comprehensive misalignment errors model by taking into account both random jitter and initial misalignment errors. Furthermore, we deduce an effective receiving area due to the deflection of the receiver with three rotation angles in three-dimensional space. Moreover, we also apply the above findings to the composite fading channel model, which is more accurate and practical than the previous. Finally, we develop closed-form results for the bit error rate (BER) in terms of the Meijer G-function of UOWC systems. The performance is also analyzed by the multiplicative statistical channel model. Results demonstrate that comprehensive misalignment errors exacerbate performance degradation in terms of both average BER and outage probability, compared to pointing errors considering only random jitter. It indicates that the initial misalignment errors are not negligible, and analyzing scenes with comprehensive misalignment errors is of great importance in practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130870036&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josaa.451074; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215531; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josaa-39-6-1014; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josaa.451074; https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-39-6-1014
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know