Reliable multiple-pulse reconstruction from second-harmonic-generation frequency-resolved optical gating spectrograms
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, ISSN: 1520-8540, Vol: 32, Issue: 5, Page: 868-877
2015
- 7Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Frequency-resolved optical gating (FROG) has become an established method of assessing the amplitude and phase profiles of ultrashort laser pulses. Second-harmonic-generation (SHG) FROG is the most widely used version, because it is relatively simple to set up and operate. However, for some complex pulse shapes it tends to produce false results. Here we discuss the reconstruction of multiple-pulse structures, a situation in which SHG FROG frequently fails. We suggest a modification of the standard procedure and demonstrate that the rate of false results is significantly reduced. We also discuss reconstruction in the presence of noise. A procedure for obtaining error bars is given; these error bars allow us to gauge the quality of the reconstruction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84982161530&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josab.32.000868; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-32-5-868; https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-32-5-868; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=josab-32-5-868&seq=0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josab.32.000868; https://opg.optica.org/josab/abstract.cfm?uri=josab-32-5-868
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know