Effect of loss on linear optical quantum logic gates
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, ISSN: 1520-8540, Vol: 38, Issue: 9, Page: C153-C159
2021
- 3Citations
- 20Usage
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef3
- Usage20
- Abstract Views20
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Linear optical quantum gates have been proposed as a possible implementation for quantum computers. Most experimental linear optical quantum gates are constructed with free-space optical components with negligible loss. In this work, we analyze symmetric and asymmetric partially polarizing lossy beam splitters.Using the generalized beam splitter equations, we study the effects of loss on two linear optical quantum gates: The first is a commonly used CNOT gate, and the second is aWstate expansion gate. Envisioning inherent loss in plasmonics and metamaterials as a new degree of freedom and those materials systems as a route for miniaturization, we reconsider the requirements of the lossy CNOT gate and show it is possible to simplify the three-beam-splitter design to a single beam splitter without sacrificing success probability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112767338&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josab.430603; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=josab-38-9-C153; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/michigantech-p/15253; https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=34555&context=michigantech-p; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/josab.430603; https://opg.optica.org/josab/abstract.cfm?uri=josab-38-9-C153
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know