Corrections to the knife-edge based reconstruction scheme of tightly focused light beams
Optics Express, ISSN: 1094-4087, Vol: 21, Issue: 21, Page: 25069-25076
2013
- 12Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef10
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
The knife-edge method is an established technique for profiling light beams. It was shown, that this technique even works for tightly focused beams, if the material and geometry of the probing knife-edges are chosen carefully. Furthermore, it was also reported recently that this method fails, when the knife-edges are made from pure materials. The artifacts introduced in the reconstructed beam shape and position depend strongly on the edge and input beam parameters, because the knife-edge is excited by the incoming beam. Here we show, that the actual beam shape and spot size of tightly focused beams can still be derived from knife-edge measurements for pure edge materials and different edge thicknesses by adapting the analysis method of the experimental data taking into account the interaction of the beam with the edge. © 2013 Optical Society of America.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84886403695&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.025069; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24150349; https://www.osapublishing.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-21-21-25069; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=oe-21-21-25069&seq=0; https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-21-21-25069; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.025069; https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-21-21-25069&id=268982
The Optical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know