On the accuracy bounds of high-order image correlation spectroscopy
Optics Express, ISSN: 1094-4087, Vol: 32, Issue: 13, Page: 22095-22109
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
High-order image correlation spectroscopy (HICS) or related image-based cumulant analysis of emitter species are important for identifying properties and concentrations of biomolecules or nanoparticles. However, lack of a thorough parameter space test limits its use in full potential. The current study focused on mapping accuracy bounds of bimodal species concentration space by simulating and analysing more than 2 × 10 images (∼10 data points). Concentration space maps for four values of quantum yield contrast ratio between two species in a mixture and two sampling spaces (834 and 13357 beam areas in an image) were created, which showed clear accuracy bounds governed by two factors, Poisson fluctuation and quantum yield ratio. Typically, brighter species concentration was 1-3 orders of magnitude lower than that of dimmer species, and higher brightness contrast allowed higher concentration difference. Upper limit of accuracy bounds was governed by resolvable Poisson fluctuation, where this condition was violated for emitter density beyond 10 particles per beam area. The accuracy bounds are shown to be largely invariant under noise correction or the calculation method, and are compared against previous experimental results, showing consistent agreement. This study shows that concentration limit needs to be observed when using HICS or related image moment or cumulant analysis techniques. As a rule of thumb, a large quantum yield contrast and large sampling points allow more concentration difference between two species to be resolved in an analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196754049&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe.521390; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39538705; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-32-13-22095; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe.521390; https://opg.optica.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-32-13-22095&id=551408
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know