Optimization of hybrid imaging systems based on maximization of kurtosis of the restored point spread function
Optics Letters, ISSN: 0146-9592, Vol: 36, Issue: 24, Page: 4740-4742
2011
- 5Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
I propose a novel, but yet simple, no-reference, objective image quality measure based on the kurtosis of the restored point spread function. Using this measure, I optimize several phase masks for extended-depth-of-field in hybrid imaging systems and obtain results that are identical to optimization results based on full-reference image measures of restored images. In comparison with full-reference measures, the kurtosis measure is fast to compute and requires no images, noise distributions, or alignment of restored images, but only the signal-to-noise-ratio. © 2011 Optical Society of America.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84055224083&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ol.36.004740; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22179868; https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-36-24-4740; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=ol-36-24-4740&seq=0; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-36-24-4740; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/ol.36.004740; https://opg.optica.org/ol/abstract.cfm?uri=ol-36-24-4740
The Optical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know