High-throughput, image-based phenotyping reveals nutrient-dependent growth facilitation in a grass-legume mixture
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 10 October, Page: e0239673
2020
- 12Citations
- 21Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
- Mentions3
- Blog Mentions2
- Blog2
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent Blog
Introducing the Plant Phenomics & Precision Agriculture Collection
We are very excited to launch our new Collection on Plant Phenomics and Precision Agriculture. Our Guest Editors- Malia Gehan, Guillaume Lobet and Sierra Young- have curated a diverse group of research articles selected from the pool of submissions we received in response to our call for papers. Here we highlight some of the articles included in the Collection at launch- but more will be added in
Most Recent News
Mixed-pasture response gauged
How mixed pastures respond to nutrient limitation was the subject of a recent study at The Plant Accelerator in Adelaide, Australia. Using the Australian Plant
Article Description
This study used high throughput, image-based phenotyping (HTP) to distinguish growth patterns, detect facilitation and interpret variations to nutrient uptake in a model mixed-pasture system in response to factorial low and high nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) application. HTP has not previously been used to examine pasture species in mixture. We used redgreen- blue (RGB) imaging to obtain smoothed projected shoot area (sPSA) to predict absolute growth (AG) up to 70 days after planting (sPSA, DAP 70), to identify variation in relative growth rates (RGR, DAP 35-70) and detect overyielding (an increase in yield in mixture compared with monoculture, indicating facilitation) in a grass-legume model pasture. Finally, using principal components analysis we interpreted between species changes to HTPderived temporal growth dynamics and nutrient uptake in mixtures and monocultures. Overyielding was detected in all treatments and was driven by both grass and legume. Our data supported expectations of more rapid grass growth and augmented nutrient uptake in the presence of a legume. Legumes grew more slowly in mixture and where growth became more reliant on soil P. Relative growth rate in grass was strongly associated with shoot N concentration, whereas legume RGR was not strongly associated with shoot nutrients. High throughput, image-based phenotyping was a useful tool to quantify growth trait variation between contrasting species and to this end is highly useful in understanding nutrient-yield relationships in mixed pasture cultivations.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0239673; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092620167&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33027289; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239673; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239673&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know