Reinforcement of gametic isolation in drosophila
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1544-9173, Vol: 8, Issue: 3, Page: e1000341
2010
- 77Citations
- 141Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations77
- Citation Indexes77
- 77
- CrossRef39
- Captures141
- Readers141
- 141
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Reinforcement, a process by which natural selection increases reproductive isolation between populations, has been suggested to be an important force in the formation of new species. However, all existing cases of reinforcement involve an increase in mate discrimination between species. Here, I report the first case of reinforcement of postmating prezygotic isolation (i.e., barriers that act after mating but before fertilization) in animals. On the slopes of the African island of São Tomé, Drosophila yakuba and its endemic sister species D. santomea hybridize within a well-demarcated hybrid zone. I find that D. yakuba females from within this zone, but not from outside it, show an increase in gametic isolation from males of D. santomea, an apparent result of natural selection acting to reduce maladaptive hybridization between species. To determine whether such a barrier could evolve under laboratory conditions, I exposed D. yakuba lines derived from allopatric populations to experimental sympatry with D. santomea, and found that both behavioral and gametic isolation become stronger after only four generations. Reinforcement thus appears to be the best explanation for the heightened gametic isolation seen in sympatry. This appears to be the first example in animals in which natural selection has promoted the evolution of stronger interspecific genetic barriers that act after mating but before fertilization. This suggests that many other genetic barriers between species have been increased by natural selection but have been overlooked because they are difficult to study. © 2010 Daniel R. Matute.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77950564670&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20351771; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000341; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000341.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know