Neighbourhood continuity is not required for correct testis gene expression in Drosophila
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1544-9173, Vol: 8, Issue: 11, Page: e1000552
2010
- 28Citations
- 79Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes28
- 28
- CrossRef25
- Captures79
- Readers79
- 79
Article Description
It is now widely accepted that gene organisation in eukaryotic genomes is non-random and it is proposed that such organisation may be important for gene expression and genome evolution. In particular, the results of several large-scale gene expression analyses in a range of organisms from yeast to human indicate that sets of genes with similar tissue-specific or temporal expression profiles are clustered within the genome in gene expression neighbourhoods. While the existence of neighbourhoods is clearly established, the underlying reason for this facet of genome organisation is currently unclear and there is little experimental evidence that addresses the genomic requisites for neighbourhood organisation. We report the targeted disruption of three well-defined male-specific gene expression neighbourhoods in the Drosophila genome by the synthesis of precisely mapped chromosomal inversions. We compare gene expression in individuals carrying inverted chromosomes with their non-inverted but otherwise identical progenitors using whole-transcriptome microarray analysis, validating these data with specific quantitative real-time PCR assays. For each neighbourhood we generate and examine multiple inversions. We find no significant differences in the expression of genes that define each of the neighbourhoods. We further show that the inversions spatially separate both halves of a neighbourhood in the nucleus. Thus, models explaining neighbourhood organisation in terms of local sequence interactions, enhancer crosstalk, or short-range chromatin effects are unlikely to account for this facet of genome organisation. Our study challenges the notion that, at least in the case of the testis, expression neighbourhoods are a feature of eukaryotic genome organisation necessary for correct gene expression. © 2010 Meadows et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649931868&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21151342; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g003; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1000552; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000552.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know