Alternative splicing of RNA triplets is often regulated and accelerates proteome evolution
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1544-9173, Vol: 10, Issue: 1, Page: e1001229
2012
- 82Citations
- 179Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations82
- Citation Indexes82
- CrossRef82
- 81
- Captures179
- Readers179
- 179
Article Description
Thousands of human genes contain introns ending in NAGNAG (N any nucleotide), where both NAGs can function as 3′ splice sites, yielding isoforms that differ by inclusion/exclusion of three bases. However, few models exist for how such splicing might be regulated, and some studies have concluded that NAGNAG splicing is purely stochastic and nonfunctional. Here, we used deep RNA-Seq data from 16 human and eight mouse tissues to analyze the regulation and evolution of NAGNAG splicing. Using both biological and technical replicates to estimate false discovery rates, we estimate that at least 25% of alternatively spliced NAGNAGs undergo tissue-specific regulation in mammals, and alternative splicing of strongly tissue-specific NAGNAGs was 10 times as likely to be conserved between species as was splicing of non-tissue-specific events, implying selective maintenance. Preferential use of the distal NAG was associated with distinct sequence features, including a more distal location of the branch point and presence of a pyrimidine immediately before the first NAG, and alteration of these features in a splicing reporter shifted splicing away from the distal site. Strikingly, alignments of orthologous exons revealed a ~15-fold increase in the frequency of three base pair gaps at 3′ splice sites relative to nearby exon positions in both mammals and in Drosophila. Alternative splicing of NAGNAGs in human was associated with dramatically increased frequency of exon length changes at orthologous exon boundaries in rodents, and a model involving point mutations that create, destroy, or alter NAGNAGs can explain both the increased frequency and biased codon composition of gained/lost sequence observed at the beginnings of exons. This study shows that NAGNAG alternative splicing generates widespread differences between the proteomes of mammalian tissues, and suggests that the evolutionary trajectories of mammalian proteins are strongly biased by the locations and phases of the introns that interrupt coding sequences. © 2012 Bradley et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856480471&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235189; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/22235189; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3250501; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/metrics?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g001; http://www.plosbiology.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001229.g005; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001229
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know