A Meiosis-Specific Form of the APC/C Promotes the Oocyte-to-Embryo Transition by Decreasing Levels of the Polo Kinase Inhibitor Matrimony
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1544-9173, Vol: 11, Issue: 9, Page: e1001648
2013
- 36Citations
- 40Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- CrossRef36
- 29
- Captures40
- Readers40
- 40
Article Description
Oocytes are stockpiled with proteins and mRNA that are required to drive the initial mitotic divisions of embryogenesis. But are there proteins specific to meiosis whose levels must be decreased to begin embryogenesis properly? The Drosophila protein Cortex (Cort) is a female, meiosis-specific activator of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C), an E3 ubiquitin ligase. We performed immunoprecipitation of Cortex followed by mass spectrometry, and identified the Polo kinase inhibitor Matrimony (Mtrm) as a potential interactor with Cort. In vitro binding assays showed Mtrm and Cort can bind directly. We found Mtrm protein levels to be reduced dramatically during the oocyte-to-embryo transition, and this downregulation did not take place in cort mutant eggs, consistent with Mtrm being a substrate of APC. We showed that Mtrm is subject to APC-mediated proteasomal degradation and have identified a putative APC/C recognition motif in Mtrm that when mutated partially stabilized the protein in the embryo. Furthermore, overexpression of Mtrm in the early embryo caused aberrant nuclear divisions and developmental defects, and these were enhanced by decreasing levels of active Polo. These data indicate APC ubiquitylates Mtrm at the oocyte-to-embryo transition, thus preventing excessive inhibition of Polo kinase activity due to Mtrm's presence. © 2013 Whitfield et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884581476&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24019759; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001648; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001648.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know