Antarctica's Protected Areas Are Inadequate, Unrepresentative, and at Risk
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1545-7885, Vol: 12, Issue: 6, Page: e1001888
2014
- 109Citations
- 151Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations109
- Citation Indexes95
- 95
- CrossRef87
- Policy Citations14
- Policy Citation14
- Captures151
- Readers151
- 151
- Mentions2
- News Mentions1
- News1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
Call to better protect ‘the last wilderness on Earth’
The surge in visitors to Antarctica over recent years has prompted environmental scientists to call for better protection of Antarctica’s ice-free land from human activities.
Article Description
Antarctica is widely regarded as one of the planet's last true wildernesses, insulated from threat by its remoteness and declaration as a natural reserve dedicated to peace and science. However, rapidly growing human activity is accelerating threats to biodiversity. We determined how well the existing protected-area system represents terrestrial biodiversity and assessed the risk to protected areas from biological invasions, the region's most significant conservation threat. We found that Antarctica is one of the planet's least protected regions, with only 1.5% of its ice-free area formally designated as specially protected areas. Five of the distinct ice-free ecoregions have no specially designated areas for the protection of biodiversity. Every one of the 55 designated areas that protect Antarctica's biodiversity lies closer to sites of high human activity than expected by chance, and seven lie in high-risk areas for biological invasions. By any measure, including Aichi Target 11 under the Convention on Biological Diversity, Antarctic biodiversity is poorly protected by reserves, and those reserves are threatened. © 2014 Shaw et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903287209&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936869; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001888; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001888
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know