PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Antarctica's Protected Areas Are Inadequate, Unrepresentative, and at Risk

PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1545-7885, Vol: 12, Issue: 6, Page: e1001888
2014
  • 109
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 151
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 150
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    109
  • Captures
    151
  • Mentions
    2
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1
    • References
      1
      • Wikipedia
        1
  • Social Media
    150
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      150
      • Facebook
        150

Most Recent News

Call to better protect ‘the last wilderness on Earth’

The surge in visitors to Antarctica over recent years has prompted environmental scientists to call for better protection of Antarctica’s ice-free land from human activities.

Article Description

Antarctica is widely regarded as one of the planet's last true wildernesses, insulated from threat by its remoteness and declaration as a natural reserve dedicated to peace and science. However, rapidly growing human activity is accelerating threats to biodiversity. We determined how well the existing protected-area system represents terrestrial biodiversity and assessed the risk to protected areas from biological invasions, the region's most significant conservation threat. We found that Antarctica is one of the planet's least protected regions, with only 1.5% of its ice-free area formally designated as specially protected areas. Five of the distinct ice-free ecoregions have no specially designated areas for the protection of biodiversity. Every one of the 55 designated areas that protect Antarctica's biodiversity lies closer to sites of high human activity than expected by chance, and seven lie in high-risk areas for biological invasions. By any measure, including Aichi Target 11 under the Convention on Biological Diversity, Antarctic biodiversity is poorly protected by reserves, and those reserves are threatened. © 2014 Shaw et al.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903287209&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24936869; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001888; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001888&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001888

Shaw, Justine D; Terauds, Aleks; Riddle, Martin J; Possingham, Hugh P; Chown, Steven L

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Neuroscience; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Immunology and Microbiology; Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know