Ionotropic Chemosensory Receptors Mediate the Taste and Smell of Polyamines
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1545-7885, Vol: 14, Issue: 5, Page: e1002454
2016
- 175Citations
- 183Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations175
- Citation Indexes175
- 175
- CrossRef84
- Captures183
- Readers183
- 183
- Mentions2
- News Mentions1
- News1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Most Recent News
Polyamine receptors boost food selection and reproductive success
The taste neurons in the leg of the fruit fly are activated via two types of polyamine receptors. This helps the fly to choose food
Article Description
The ability to find and consume nutrient-rich diets for successful reproduction and survival is fundamental to animal life. Among the nutrients important for all animals are polyamines, a class of pungent smelling compounds required in numerous cellular and organismic processes. Polyamine deficiency or excess has detrimental effects on health, cognitive function, reproduction, and lifespan. Here, we show that a diet high in polyamine is beneficial and increases reproductive success of flies, and we unravel the sensory mechanisms that attract Drosophila to polyamine-rich food and egg-laying substrates. Using a combination of behavioral genetics and in vivo calcium imaging, we demonstrate that Drosophila uses multisensory detection to find and evaluate polyamines present in overripe and fermenting fruit, their favored feeding and egg-laying substrate. In the olfactory system, two coexpressed ionotropic receptors (IRs), IR76b and IR41a, mediate the long-range attraction to the odor. In the gustatory system, multimodal taste sensation by IR76b receptor and GR66a bitter receptor neurons is used to evaluate quality and valence of the polyamine providing a mechanism for the fly’s high attraction to polyamine-rich and sweet decaying fruit. Given their universal and highly conserved biological roles, we propose that the ability to evaluate food for polyamine content may impact health and reproductive success also of other animals including humans.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; 10.3410/f.726330707.793537031; 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971548307&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27145030; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/726330707#eval793537031; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.726330707.793537031; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002454; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002454.g006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know