Tracking Career Outcomes for Postdoctoral Scholars: A Call to Action
PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1545-7885, Vol: 14, Issue: 5, Page: e1002458
2016
- 31Citations
- 109Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes30
- 30
- CrossRef14
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures109
- Readers109
- 109
- Mentions3
- News Mentions2
- News2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
Creating career categories for better data collection and transparency
Share iStock.com/woolzian Creating career categories for better data collection and transparency By Maggie KuoNov. 6, 2017 , 5:17 PM A new job classification system released
Most Recent News
2017 National Postdoctoral Association Institutional Policy Report
FULL TEXT Introduction What Is the NPA's mission, and What Is a Postdoc? Since 2003, the National Postdoctoral Association (NPA) has sought to enhance the
Article Description
The oversupply of postdoctoral scholars relative to available faculty positions has led to calls for better assessment of career outcomes. Here, we report the results of a study of postdoctoral outcomes at the University of California, San Francisco, and suggest that institutions have an obligation to determine where their postdoc alumni are employed and to share this information with current and future trainees. Further, we contend that local efforts will be more meaningful than a national survey, because of the great variability in training environment and the classification of postdoctoral scholars among institutions. We provide a framework and methodology that can be adopted by others, with the goal of developing a finely grained portrait of postdoctoral career outcomes across the United States.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84971602437&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27152650; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1002458; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002458.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know