PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Death and population dynamics affect mutation rate estimates and evolvability under stress in bacteria

PLoS Biology, ISSN: 1545-7885, Vol: 16, Issue: 5, Page: e2005056
2018
  • 55
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 188
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 1
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    55
  • Captures
    188
  • Mentions
    1
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
  • Social Media
    1
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      1
      • Facebook
        1

Most Recent Blog

Do we need to get to Mars first before we start understanding change in our oceans?

The current American administration is excited about its space program on extraterrestrial exploration and discovery. A mission to the moon, several ones to Mars, and perhaps others someday to other planets are part of the current funding plan. NASA has chosen Jezero Crater as the landing site for its upcoming Mars 2020 rover mission after almost six years of scrutinizing and debating which locati

Article Description

The stress-induced mutagenesis hypothesis postulates that in response to stress, bacteria increase their genome-wide mutation rate, in turn increasing the chances that a descendant is able to better withstand the stress. This has implications for antibiotic treatment: exposure to subinhibitory doses of antibiotics has been reported to increase bacterial mutation rates and thus probably the rate at which resistance mutations appear and lead to treatment failure. More generally, the hypothesis posits that stress increases evolvability (the ability of a population to generate adaptive genetic diversity) and thus accelerates evolution. Measuring mutation rates under stress, however, is problematic, because existing methods assume there is no death. Yet subinhibitory stress levels may induce a substantial death rate. Death events need to be compensated by extra replication to reach a given population size, thus providing more opportunities to acquire mutations. We show that ignoring death leads to a systematic overestimation of mutation rates under stress. We developed a system based on plasmid segregation that allows us to measure death and division rates simultaneously in bacterial populations. Using this system, we found that a substantial death rate occurs at the tested subinhibitory concentrations previously reported to increase mutation rate. Taking this death rate into account lowers and sometimes removes the signal for stress-induced mutagenesis. Moreover, even when antibiotics increase mutation rate, we show that subinhibitory treatments do not increase genetic diversity and evolvability, again because of effects of the antibiotics on population dynamics. We conclude that antibiotic-induced mutagenesis is overestimated because of death and that understanding evolvability under stress requires accounting for the effects of stress on population dynamics as much as on mutation rate. Our goal here is dual: we show that population dynamics and, in particular, the numbers of cell divisions are crucial but neglected parameters in the evolvability of a population, and we provide experimental and computational tools and methods to study evolvability under stress, leading to a reassessment of the magnitude and significance of the stress-induced mutagenesis paradigm.

Bibliographic Details

http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047830501&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29750784; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g010; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g010; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g009; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g009; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g001; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/268493; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g010; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000268493; https://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000268493; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/268493; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g009; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g009; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g004; http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.2005056; https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g008; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/20.500.11850/268493/2/journal.pbio.2005056.pdf; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005056.g009

Antoine Frenoy; Sebastian Bonhoeffer; Arjan de Visser

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Neuroscience; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Immunology and Microbiology; Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know