Helicobacter pylori evolution: Lineage-specific adaptations in homologs of eukaryotic sel1-like genes
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 3, Issue: 8, Page: 1455-1467
2007
- 33Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef29
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 31
Article Description
Geographic partitioning is postulated to foster divergence of Helicobacter pylori populations as an adaptive response to local differences in predominant host physiology. H. pylori's ability to establish persistent infection despite host inflammatory responses likely involves active management of host defenses using bacterial proteins that may themselves be targets for adaptive evolution. Sequenced H. pylori genomes encode a family of eight or nine secreted proteins containing repeat motifs that are characteristic of the eukaryotic Sel1 regulatory protein, whereas the related Campylobacter and Wolinella genomes each contain only one or two such "Sel1-like repeat" (SLR) genes ("slr genes"). Signatures of positive selection (ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous mutations, d/d=ω > 1) were evident in the evolutionary history of H. pylori slr gene family expansion. Sequence analysis of six of these slr genes (hp0160, hp0211, hp0235, hp0519, hp0628, and hp1117) from representative East Asian, European, and African H. pylori strains revealed that all but hp0628 had undergone positive selection, with different amino acids often selected in different regions. Most striking was a divergence of Japanese and Korean alleles of hp0519, with Japanese alleles having undergone particularly strong positive selection (ω > 25), whereas alleles of other genes from these populations were intermingled. Homology-based structural modeling localized most residues under positive selection to SLR protein surfaces. Rapid evolution of certain slr genes in specific H. pylori lineages suggests a model of adaptive change driven by selection for fine-tuning of host responses, and facilitated by geograph ic isolation. Characterization of such local adaptations should help elucidate how H. pylori manages persistent infection, and potentially lead to interventions tailored to diverse human populations. © 2007 Ogura et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.eor; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g001; 10.6084/m9.figshare.60673; 10.6084/m9.figshare.60674; 10.6084/m9.figshare.60672
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34548392299&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17696605; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.eor; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g001; https://doi.org/10.6084%2Fm9.figshare.60673; https://doi.org/10.6084%2Fm9.figshare.60674; https://doi.org/10.6084%2Fm9.figshare.60672; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.eor; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60673; https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60673; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60672; https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60672; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60674; https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.60674; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.0030151; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030151
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know