Action potential initiation in the Hodgkin-Huxley model
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 5, Issue: 1, Page: e1000265
2009
- 26Citations
- 102Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef15
- Captures102
- Readers102
- 102
Article Description
A recent paper of B. Naundorf et al. described an intriguing negative correlation between variability of the onset potential at which an action potential occurs (the onset span) and the rapidity of action potential initiation (the onset rapidity). This correlation was demonstrated in numerical simulations of the Hodgkin-Huxley model. Due to this antagonism, it is argued that Hodgkin-Huxley-type models are unable to explain action potential initiation observed in cortical neurons in vivo or in vitro. Here we apply a method from theoretical physics to derive an analytical characterization of this problem. We analytically compute the probability distribution of onset potentials and analytically derive the inverse relationship between onset span and onset rapidity. We find that the relationship between onset span and onset rapidity depends on the level of synaptic background activity. Hence we are able to elucidate the regions of parameter space for which the Hodgkin-Huxley model is able to accurately describe the behavior of this system. © 2009 Colwell, Brenner.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=59149086143&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19148265; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g003; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000265; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000265
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know