Using entropy maximization to understand the determinants of structural dynamics beyond native contact topology
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 6, Issue: 6, Page: 1-12
2010
- 34Citations
- 76Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations34
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef18
- Captures76
- Readers76
- 76
Article Description
Comparison of elastic network model predictions with experimental data has provided important insights on the dominant role of the network of inter-residue contacts in defining the global dynamics of proteins. Most of these studies have focused on interpreting the mean-square fluctuations of residues, or deriving the most collective, or softest, modes of motions that are known to be insensitive to structural and energetic details. However, with increasing structural data, we are in a position to perform a more critical assessment of the structure-dynamics relations in proteins, and gain a deeper understanding of the major determinants of not only the mean-square fluctuations and lowest frequency modes, but the covariance or the cross-correlations between residue fluctuations and the shapes of higher modes. A systematic study of a large set of NMR-determined proteins is analyzed using a novel method based on entropy maximization to demonstrate that the next level of refinement in the elastic network model description of proteins ought to take into consideration properties such as contact order (or sequential separation between contacting residues) and the secondary structure types of the interacting residues, whereas the types of amino acids do not play a critical role. Most importantly, an optimal description of observed cross-correlations requires the inclusion of destabilizing, as opposed to exclusively stabilizing, interactions, stipulating the functional significance of local frustration in imparting native-like dynamics. This study provides us with a deeper understanding of the structural basis of experimentally observed behavior, and opens the way to the development of more accurate models for exploring protein dynamics. © 2010 Lezon, Bahar.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955496805&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20585542; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g002; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000816; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.t002; http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000816; http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000816?__utma=261502610.278140049.1341328884.1343840815.1343845079.32&__utmb=261502610.24.9.1343845262202&__utmc=261502610&__utmx=-&__utmz=261502610.1341328884.1.1.utmcsr=(direct)%7C; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know