HapTree: A Novel Bayesian Framework for Single Individual Polyplotyping Using NGS Data
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: e1003502
2014
- 58Citations
- 60Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations58
- Citation Indexes58
- 58
- CrossRef22
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 60
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Haplotype-resolved assembly of a tetraploid potato genome using long reads and low-depth offspring data
Abstract Potato is one of the world’s major staple crops, and like many important crop plants, it has a polyploid genome. Polyploid haplotype assembly poses
Article Description
As the more recent next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies provide longer read sequences, the use of sequencing datasets for complete haplotype phasing is fast becoming a reality, allowing haplotype reconstruction of a single sequenced genome. Nearly all previous haplotype reconstruction studies have focused on diploid genomes and are rarely scalable to genomes with higher ploidy. Yet computational investigations into polyploid genomes carry great importance, impacting plant, yeast and fish genomics, as well as the studies of the evolution of modern-day eukaryotes and (epi)genetic interactions between copies of genes. In this paper, we describe a novel maximum-likelihood estimation framework, HapTree, for polyploid haplotype assembly of an individual genome using NGS read datasets. We evaluate the performance of HapTree on simulated polyploid sequencing read data modeled after Illumina sequencing technologies. For triploid and higher ploidy genomes, we demonstrate that HapTree substantially improves haplotype assembly accuracy and efficiency over the state-of-the-art; moreover, HapTree is the first scalable polyplotyping method for higher ploidy. As a proof of concept, we also test our method on real sequencing data from NA12878 (1000 Genomes Project) and evaluate the quality of assembled haplotypes with respect to trio-based diplotype annotation as the ground truth. The results indicate that HapTree significantly improves the switch accuracy within phased haplotype blocks as compared to existing haplotype assembly methods, while producing comparable minimum error correction (MEC) values. A summary of this paper appears in the proceedings of the RECOMB 2014 conference, April 2-5. © 2014 Berger et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897413439&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24675685; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003502; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g001; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003502.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know