Probabilistic Approach to Predicting Substrate Specificity of Methyltransferases
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: e1003514
2014
- 17Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef13
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
We present a general probabilistic framework for predicting the substrate specificity of enzymes. We designed this approach to be easily applicable to different organisms and enzymes. Therefore, our predictive models do not rely on species-specific properties and use mostly sequence-derived data. Maximum Likelihood optimization is used to fine-tune model parameters and the Akaike Information Criterion is employed to overcome the issue of correlated variables. As a proof-of-principle, we apply our approach to predicting general substrate specificity of yeast methyltransferases (MTases). As input, we use several physico-chemical and biological properties of MTases: structural fold, isoelectric point, expression pattern and cellular localization. Our method accurately predicts whether a yeast MTase methylates a protein, RNA or another molecule. Among our experimentally tested predictions, 89% were confirmed, including the surprising prediction that YOR021C is the first known MTase with a SPOUT fold that methylates a substrate other than RNA (protein). Our approach not only allows for highly accurate prediction of functional specificity of MTases, but also provides insight into general rules governing MTase substrate specificity. © 2014 Szczepińska et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84897447639&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24651469; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003514; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514.g001
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know