Histone Modifications Are Associated with Transcript Isoform Diversity in Normal and Cancer Cells
PLoS Computational Biology, ISSN: 1553-7358, Vol: 10, Issue: 6, Page: e1003611
2014
- 21Citations
- 104Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef13
- Captures104
- Readers104
- 104
Article Description
Mechanisms that generate transcript diversity are of fundamental importance in eukaryotes. Although a large fraction of human protein-coding genes and lincRNAs produce more than one mRNA isoform each, the regulation of this phenomenon is still incompletely understood. Much progress has been made in deciphering the role of sequence-specific features as well as DNA-and RNA-binding proteins in alternative splicing. Recently, however, several experimental studies of individual genes have revealed a direct involvement of epigenetic factors in alternative splicing and transcription initiation. While histone modifications are generally correlated with overall gene expression levels, it remains unclear how histone modification enrichment affects relative isoform abundance. Therefore, we sought to investigate the associations between histone modifications and transcript diversity levels measured by the rates of transcription start-site switching and alternative splicing on a genome-wide scale across protein-coding genes and lincRNAs. We found that the relationship between enrichment levels of epigenetic marks and transcription start-site switching is similar for protein-coding genes and lincRNAs. Furthermore, we found associations between splicing rates and enrichment levels of H2az, H3K4me1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, H3K9me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3, H3K36me3, H3K79me2, and H4K20me, marks traditionally associated with enhancers, transcription initiation, transcriptional repression, and others. These patterns were observed in both normal and cancer cell lines. Additionally, we developed a novel computational method that identified 840 epigenetically regulated candidate genes and predicted transcription start-site switching and alternative exon splicing with up to 92% accuracy based on epigenetic patterning alone. Our results suggest that the epigenetic regulation of transcript isoform diversity may be a relatively common genome-wide phenomenon representing an avenue of deregulation in tumor development. © 2014 Podlaha et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g003; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g005; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.t001; 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g007
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84903384854&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24901363; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g005; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g007; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.t001; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g003; https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1003611; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611.g002; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611; http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003611&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know